|
Jacquetta
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2008, 08:56:04 PM » |
|
Hello there
The itinerary you list is basically 6 days on the mountain: days 3-6 are ascent, including from midnight day 6/7, with 1.5 days of descent. This is what people used to think of as standard, but for an unacclimatised lowlander it's challenging. If your money isn't committed to this itinerary, I'd suggest switching to something more gradual: every extra day you can spend on the mountain is giving yourself a better chance of staying well and enjoying the summit experience.
If you are already committed, however, take comfort in the fact that a much older, much less fit person (i.e. me) has summited twice by Machame (in 2000 and 2008). However, the other two times I summited (by less strenuous routes) I had no altitude symptoms whatsoever, whereas on Machame I had AMS both times: moderately severe in 2000, only mild in 2008, but well worth avoiding if you can. On both occasions it was on the descent into Barranco (from 4600 m to 3950 m), and I was really frustrated to find myself ill again in the exact same spot, 8 years later! However, both times I had recovered by next morning and went on to summit via Barafu Camp (your 4600 m camp). So don't assume that a bout of AMS means the end of your trip.
However, and this bit is relevant to your decision, I was a lot less ill this year (aged 60, no physical training unless you count extending the daily dog walk) than in 2000 (when fitter, younger and much better prepared) and think this was because the itinerary was a day longer. Over-exertion is a known risk factor in altitude sickness. So if you have the option to give yourself longer, please do. In relation to the overall cost of a Kili trip, the marginal cost of an extra day is a small price to pay for increased prospect of success and enjoyment. In a perfect world, the ideal pre-training is to climb Mount Meru, which I did in 2004 pre-Rongai, and it pre-empted any altitude symptoms whatsoever.
|