Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2012, 10:31:29 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
SMF - Just Installed
751 Posts in 200 Topics by 2339 Members
Latest Member: Kiarna Boyd
* Home Help Search Login Register

The Great Glen Way

Perfect companion: 4th edition of our popular waterproof guidebook, fully updated in 2010
Discount code: RRforums12

+  Rucksack Readers
|-+  Rucksack Readers
| |-+  Great Glen Way, Fort William to Inverness, Scotland
| | |-+  How long is the Great Glen Way?

« previous next »

Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: How long is the Great Glen Way?  (Read 1332 times)
JennieL
Member
**
Posts: 16


« on: November 12, 2010, 06:59:44 PM »

Excuse me if this question sounds basic, but how long is the Way?  The excellent guidebook I got from Rucksack Readers says it's 73 miles, but the Footprint map I bought at the same time, from the same source, says 77 miles and somebody told me it might be more.  What length is it, exactly? Huh
Logged
Jacquetta
Administrator
Emeritus Member
*****
Posts: 172


WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2010, 04:43:33 PM »

Hi Jennie
Great question – but almost unanswerable!  Unless you can persuade somebody with an accurate trundle-wheel or GPS to walk continuously down the centre of the entire route without stopping or deviating for food, sleep or calls of nature, you have to accept that all figures are approximate.  The larger the scale of the map you consult, the more wiggles and bends the route seems to have, and the longer it appears.  It's very hard to measure route length accurately.

The figures we give in our guidebook (Table 1, page 6) for a five-day walk (Fort William, Gairlochy, Fort Augustus, Invermoriston, Drumnadrochit, Inverness) show section mileages of 10, 13, 18, 14 and 18 miles respectively (16, 21, 29, 22 and 29 km), with a total of 73 miles/117 km.  These were supplied to us (back in 2000 Shocked) by the Great Glen Way Management Committee and we don't actually know how they were measured, but we suspect from a GIS system held on computer at large scale.

Your post reminds me to ask the present management for an update.  Footprint mapping is normally reliable, and the team has a consistent method for deriving their distances.  An extra 4 miles is 5% more than 73 miles, and worth investigating.  Thanks for your question!
Logged

Jacquetta Megarry, publisher of Rucksack Readers and forum moderator
Jacquetta
Administrator
Emeritus Member
*****
Posts: 172


WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2010, 10:45:44 AM »

Update from Auchterawe: Lynda Dodd, who is the Route Manager, tells me they have recently undertaken a trundle wheel exercise and measured a new length of 78.95 miles, confirmed by their GPS.

Clearly this suggests that the 73-mile figure which they've always (up to now) quoted in their official publications, and which we adopted in various editions of our guidebook Embarrassed, is an under-estimate.  The Footprint map measures its length overall as 77 miles, which is closer to the 79-mile distance.

After all the fuss that was made early this year about the West Highland Way getting a mile longer, it turns out that the real story of 2010 is that the Great Glen Way is 6 miles longer (or maybe 4, depending whom you believe  Undecided).
Logged

Jacquetta Megarry, publisher of Rucksack Readers and forum moderator
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!